Quick Reference

Menu map, demo-data codes and statuses

Group Models
Inspections & Observations Inspection, Inspection Response, Ground Observation, Inspection Template, Inspection Item
Monitoring & Thresholds Monitoring Instrument, Instrument Channel, Monitoring Current, Monitoring Reading, Threshold Set, Threshold Rule
TARP & Restrictions TARP Activation, TARP Action Execution, Operational Restriction, TARP Plan, TARP Action
Hazards & Controls Geotechnical Hazard, Hazard Control
Events, Work & Review Geotechnical Event, Work Request, Work Verification, Technical Review, Corrective Action, Management of Change
Ground Support Ground Support Design, Ground Support Installation, Support Inspection
Sites, Areas & Excavations Site, Area, Excavation, Geotechnical Domain, Excavation Domain
Plans & Design Basis Ground Control Plan, Design Basis
People & Organisations Person, Organisation
Documents & Evidence Document, Evidence Attachment

Key Codes in the Demo Data

The demo runs one site — Demonstration Mine (DEMO01), open pit, Queensland — through the pack's north-wall escalation scenario, with a quieter second excavation carrying the healthy, in-control case alongside it.

Code What it is
DEMO01 The site. Areas PIT-A → NORTH-WALL, RAMP-3
NW-HIGHWALL-01 North Wall Highwall — the excavation at the centre of the escalation
NW-BENCH-420 North Wall Bench RL420 — the quiet, healthy path (routine inspection, closed rockfall)
RAMP3-CUT Ramp 3 Cut — the exposure area that gets excluded
DOM-FAULT-N1 North Wall Fault Zone (structural) — the domain the planar hazard sits in
GEO-HAZ-00001 The escalating hazard. North highwall planar failure on fault — POSSIBLE × MAJOR, inherent HIGH, residual MODERATE
GEO-HAZ-00002 Bench crest rockfall and raveling — LIKELY × MODERATE
GCP-DEMO-001-A / -B Ground-control plan Rev A (SUPERSEDED) and Rev B (ACTIVE, adds the radar-driven TARP)
GEO-DES-00013 / -00014 Design basis 2024 (SUPERSEDED) and 2025 (ACTIVE)
RAD-NW-01 / MOVEMENT_RATE Slope radar movement-rate channel — the one the thresholds watch
PRISM-NW-101 / TOTAL_MOVEMENT Prism total displacement — the independent confirmation
PIEZ-NW-05 / WATER_LEVEL Piezometer — carries the SUSPECT reading that cannot lower a level
NW-WALL-THRESH v1.0 Threshold set: LEVEL_1 ≥ 2.0, LEVEL_2 ≥ 5.0, LEVEL_3 ≥ 10.0 mm/h
TARP-NW-WALL North Wall Ground Movement TARP — 5 actions across LEVEL_1 → LEVEL_3
GEO-TARP-2026-00003 The activation. Triggered by the 2.4 mm/h radar reading + the HIGH crack observation; activated LEVEL_1, escalated to current LEVEL_2; still ACTIVE, not de-escalated
GEO-OBS-2026-000501 The HIGH highwall crest tension crack (35 mm, opening) that escalated
GEO-RES-2026-00003 The LEVEL_2 exclusion zone on the ramp exposure area — ACTIVE, release criteria set, not yet released
GEO-WR-2026-00003 Scale + drainage work request — status VERIFIED, release recommended
GEO-REV-2026-00003 TARP-review of the activation; requested the supplementary prism survey
GEO-ACT-2026-00011 Corrective action — add CH1420 drainage to the re-entry inspection (COMPLETED, verified)
GEO-MOC-2026-0004 Management of change — add a piezometric trigger to the TARP (status REVIEW)
GEO-EVT-2026-00007 The closed rockfall on bench RL420 — caught by the catch bench, 0 exposed, CLOSED

The Escalation, Step by Step

  1. 38.5 mm overnight rain → post-rainfall wall re-entry inspection GEO-INSP-2026-000101 on the highwall.
  2. Inspection fails: new 35 mm tension crack, access DETERIORATING, safe_for_access = false, immediate_restriction_required = true.
  3. Radar movement rate climbs 0.4 → 1.2 → 2.4 mm/h, crossing LEVEL_1 for its persistence.
  4. GEO-TARP-2026-00003 created (LEVEL_1), triggered by the reading and the HIGH crack observation; preserves NW-WALL-THRESH v1.0 / LEVEL_1.
  5. Movement continues → escalates to LEVEL_2; ramp exposure area put under the exclusion GEO-RES-2026-00003.
  6. TARP actions executed and cross-verified; technical review requests a supplementary prism survey.
  7. Scaling + drainage work GEO-WR-2026-00003 → drains cleared, toe bund reinstated at CH1420 → work VERIFIED.
  8. Radar returns to 0.5 mm/h by 22 July — but the TARP stays LEVEL_2; de-escalation waits on the recorded competent-person approval.

Status Vocabularies (the important ones)

Record lifecycle (most models): DRAFT → REVIEW → APPROVED → ACTIVE, then SUSPENDED · COMPLETED · CLOSED · CANCELLED · SUPERSEDED · ARCHIVED

Restriction status: PROPOSED · ACTIVE · SUSPENDED · RELEASE_PENDING · RELEASED · EXPIRED · SUPERSEDED

Work status: REQUESTED · APPROVED · PLANNED · READY · IN_PROGRESS · ON_HOLD · COMPLETE · VERIFIED · CLOSED · CANCELLED

Reading quality: VALID · ESTIMATED · SUSPECT · REJECTED · MISSING — only VALID/ESTIMATED may update the live picture; SUSPECT/REJECTED can never lower a TARP level

TARP level: NORMAL · LEVEL_1 · LEVEL_2 · LEVEL_3 · EMERGENCY

Observation / inspection severity: INFORMATION · NORMAL · MONITOR · ALERT · HIGH · CRITICAL

Risk: LOW · MODERATE · HIGH · EXTREME; Likelihood: RARE · UNLIKELY · POSSIBLE · LIKELY · ALMOST_CERTAIN; Consequence: INSIGNIFICANT · MINOR · MODERATE · MAJOR · CATASTROPHIC

Verification outcome: PASS · PASS_WITH_ACTION · FAIL · NOT_VERIFIED

Support condition: GOOD · SERVICEABLE · DAMAGED · FAILED · CORRODED · OVERLOADED · MISSING · UNKNOWN

Rules of Thumb

  • A radar reading that breaches a threshold preserves the threshold version on the activation — the number alone is never enough.
  • A TARP never de-escalates because a later reading is quiet. It waits on a recorded competent-person approval. The demo shows exactly this.
  • A SUSPECT or REJECTED reading can flag a problem but can never lower a level or update the live MonitoringCurrent.
  • Completed work does not release an exclusion. Verification only recommends release; the restriction's criteria and an authorised approval still gate the RELEASED status.
  • Corrections to approved records are superseding rows with a reason, not edits — see the plan and design-basis revisions.
  • Release, verification and change approval are done by a different person from the one who requested or owns the work — the columns are separate on purpose.